I think it would be reasonable to ask Christer for that clarification to be added.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 13:13 > To: Dean Willis > Cc: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); Hadriel Kaplan; > [email protected]; Christer Holmberg > Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt > > Dean Willis writes: > > > Outbound already provides a discovery mechanism letting a > UA find out > whether or not a proxy supports STUN over SIP. > If I understand it > correctly, this draft is an attempt to > make such a mechanism available > in the absence of Outbound. > > dean, > > that is fine and i hope that the draft is rewritten to > clearly limit its > scope to "letting a UA find out whether or not a proxy supports STUN > over SIP". > > then existing UA/proxy implementations would not get broken and we > can completely ignore this draft in openser proxy. > > -- juha > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
