If by "3GPP/IMS related drafts/rfcs" you mean the P-headers in 3455, it's the IETF that wanted them to be submitted I thought. It's only informational. What drafts were you thinking of?
They use the Internet, or their private networks connect to the Internet, and thus we should want them to tell us what they feel is missing from SIP. We can use the info to decide if it's generally useful for everyone, or not, or even as an example of what not to do and try to persuade them down a different path. They potentially represent a significant population of UA's that we should want to be reachable over the Internet in some form, to/from pure IETF-compliant UA's. -hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:50 PM > To: Hadriel Kaplan > Cc: Henry Sinnreich; Dean Willis; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] Toward the Evolution of SIP and Related Working Groups > > Hadriel Kaplan writes: > > > The main deliverable of the IETF is documentation, for the purpose of > > achieving interoperability, to make the Internet better. > > please let me know how all those 3gpp/ims related drafts/rfcs that > sip[ping] wgs have produced help to make Internet better? > > -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
