> QUESTION 1 TO SIP WG: Are the use cases sufficiently important to > proceed with this draft? The document states:
I agree this is a relevant use-case. If there's no other one, I think we don't have to torture ourselves with too many use-cases, as it would complicate the solution. By the way, I like short & simple drafts like this one ;-) > QUESTION 2 TO SIP WG: Do we have a robust set of requirements for > proceeding with this work? The document currently lists: I would add one explicit requirement like: It MUST be possible for a UA to negotiate a keep-alive mecanism outside a SIP registration. Cheers, Xavier _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
