Le Thursday 19 June 2008 12:30:30 ext DRAGE, Keith (Keith), vous avez écrit : > QUESTION 1 TO SIP WG: Are the use cases sufficiently important to > proceed with this draft? The document states: (...) > The Outbound mechanism is enabled during the UA registration phase. > However, there are use-cases where the UA does not register itself, > but still needs to be able to make calls and maintain NAT bindings > open during the duration of that call.
> A typical example is emergency calls. I don't get this one. You don't need to send keep-alive packets to make an outbound call (be it urgent or not). > There are also cases where entities do not support > the Outbound mechanism, but still want to be able to indicate support > and use the keep-alive techniques defined in [I-D.ietf-sip-outbound]. I don't get this either. If you don't support Outbound, why not use plain SIP OPTIONS, which works _today_? -- Rémi Denis-Courmont _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
