Hi, I agree it may be a good idea to not forbid sending it reliably.
I do think it would be good to have text, saying that it can be sent unreliable even if reliable responses are required, though, so that proxies aren't forced to terminate PRACKs etc. Regards, Christer -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21. kesäkuuta 2008 1:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft submission: draft-ietf-sip-199-00 From: "Christer Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [CHH] Whether the text should be in the document at all depends on if we allow 199 to be sent reliably in the first place. Based on the comments received so far we should not mandate 199 to be sent reliably, even if 100rel is required by the UAC. But, the question if whether we want to FORBID sending it reliably. If we ever might allow 199 to be used for HERFP, we should admit the possibility of sending it reliably in the first draft. Otherwise, we'll be locked out of sending it reliably in the future. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
