Hi, 

>>>>One option, as proposed by Paul, is to say that a UAC shall be able
to RECEIVE reliable 199 responses.
>>>Based on my comments above, I am reconsidering the advisability of
that.
>> 
>>Well, I guess it wouldn't affect the complexness in the UAC, since it
will have to be able to handle reliable 
>>provisional responses anyway (if it indicates support of it, that is).
>
>Yes, I think it does increase the complexity in the implementation of
199 handling.
>
>You are right that the PRACK itself would be handled by the standard
machinery for reliable provisionals. But then 
>tearing down the dialog, which is what the 199 is supposed to trigger,
can't be done upon receipt of a reliable 199. 
>Rather it must wait until the after the PRACK is at least send, and
perhaps until the 200 for the prack is received. And >this is different
than for the unreliable 199. This isn't rocket science, but it is more
complexity. And of course it 
>requires something that sends reliable 199s in order to test the UAC.

It is true that the PRACK transaction must be "alive" until the 200 OK
is received, but I assume all other "resources" can be released once the
199 is received.

Regards,

Christer


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to