> > So the title of the document would be "Validating SIP From > > Considered > > Harmful". After writing that document, do you feel the > > community would > > then see the need for designing a B2BUA-survivable identity > > mechanism?? > > > > -d > > No mechanism can survive with B2BUAs and intermediaries in general.
Two I-Ds have been proposed which will survive B2BUAs and SBCs: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fischer-sip-e2e-sec-media-00 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-sip-identity-media-02 > That's why we have the e2e principle on the Internet. TLS and IPsec work through transport- and network-layer intermediaries (NATs and NAPTs), and NAPTs destroy the e2e principle. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
