I have specific issues which I will bring to the list before the
meeting.
If I am the only person with issues to discuss, then any face time
needed to close this can be with Christer in the hall.
This is part of why I want people to send in what the three _drafts_
they think are the most important to talk about
(I re-emphasize draft here - its different from topics - we know we
have some large issues to discuss, but we need
to give the editors, and frankly the reviewers, more insight into how
much constituency each topic really has at
the moment).
On Jul 18, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
I do want to talk about 199.
But the author Christer said:
As I said earlier, I see no major issue with 199 at this point
which would require face-to-face discussions. I could give a status
update, but that would only take about 5 minutes.
So, which is it? Robert, are you aware of any specific issues? Or do
you just have general concerns that we aren't getting closure on the
list?
--
Dean, the agenda mangling cochair
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
