On Jul 17, 2008, at 24:31 , Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
I'm also very surprised SIP can be scheduled in conflict with any other RAI WG, especially a brand new one. :(
All the RAI groups that requested more than one session had their second session scheduled in conflict with another meeting. If anyone wants to tell me what groups should be closed to make more time for SIP, or what WG needs less time than they are currently getting, well that would be very useful input to me. Wishing there was more time is something the IESG is working on for IETF 73. We are trying to consider how to run meetings on Friday afternoon to provide more time. No final decisions have been made on this but you can expect to hear more about this in Dublin before any decisions get made.
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
