+1

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 17 October 2008 01:08
> To: Dean Willis
> Cc: Christer Holmberg; Elwell, John; Bob Penfield; Juha 
> Heinanen; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound
> 
> I agree.
> 
>       Paul
> 
> Dean Willis wrote:
> > 
> > On Oct 16, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> >>
> >> Making this behavior "possible but not default" means that 
> there must 
> >> be two options: "do it", and "don't do it". The choice of 
> which to do 
> >> would need to be encoded somewhere. This matters a lot to 
> the UA, so I 
> >> think this option would have to be encoded as part of the 
> registration 
> >> request. Thus outbound would have to change to accommodate it.
> > 
> > 
> > If you want outbound's redundant-flow functionality, which 
> is dependent 
> > on requests NOT forking to each flow to a UA, use outbound 
> as specified.
> > 
> > If instead you want your two contacts treated as two 
> different instances 
> > so that requests will fork to them, use two different instance-id 
> > values. Essentially, you're using single-contact/single 
> flow Outbound 
> > (i.e., keepalive and reverse-routing of requests without 
> redundant-flow) 
> > simultaneously on two different contacts (which may well be two 
> > different interfaces).
> > 
> > If you want both outbound's features simultaneously on multiple 
> > instances (or use virtual interfaces by having multiple 
> instances on the 
> > same interface), then apply outbound as specified on each instance, 
> > where there are at least two proxies configured for each instance.
> > 
> > About the only thing I can see needing to document somewhere is the 
> > concept of using multiple instance-ids to make virtual 
> interfaces, and 
> > that's pretty simple.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Dean
> > 
> > 
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to