DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
At the moment I am also unsure what criteria we would use for identifing
a legacy usage, apart from some rather vague textual description. It
after all does not have a package name.
With legacy usage, the only distinguishing characteristic that I am
aware has ever been used is Content-Type. So I think the registry has to
be based on Content-Type, probably on a FCFS basis. (Though perhaps
there might be need of an appeals process if there are conflicting
usages. But I doubt we will find that.)
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
