> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > I see: > > 8. Security Considerations > > There are no specific security issues for this mechanism, beyond > those already applicable to SIP-based session signaling. [TBD] > > And yet there are significant security considerations. E.g.: > > The reason for specifying the mechanism, and its length, is to make > it impossible to determine the manufacturer of the device which > generated it by looking at its format or value.
Quite true - my mistake. > 9. IANA Considerations > > This document makes no request of IANA. > > > And of course the entire *purpose* of the draft is to define a > standardized header, which is an IANA consideration. Yeah Bob pointed that out to me too the second after I submitted it. D'oh! Thanks for catching them! -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
