> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:08 PM > > I'm still troubled by what I perceive as an inversion of the names: I > think of a 'session' as something that happens within a 'call'. I > believe that you're looking for something that's a parent of 'call-id's, > not a child. Might I suggest 'Call-Set-Id'?
Yeah, header names are funny things. We want them to mean X, but other people interpret them to mean Y, and in reality they end up meaning Z. :) I used the term "Session-ID" because it was what I thought common operators of SIP deployments would expect it to be, because I think most people think of a Session as actually a superset of a Call-ID - the Call-ID could change 15 times along the path, but it's the same session. (in many ways a Call-ID is not a "Call" identifier at all!) But I grant that it confuses us with media "sessions". How about: "Correlation-ID", or even "Opaque-Call-ID"? -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
