> Option-tag: > ----------- > > I strongly think we should define an option tag for info packages.
I think you need to provide more than this in terms of explanation. What interoperability issues do you think is solved by providing an option tag for the extension itself, as opposed to individual packages? Give us some valid scenarios. regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:12 PM > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Elwell, John; Eric Burger; SIP List > Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags > > > Hi, > > Feature-tags: > ------------- > > >I agree with John here. > > > >I would include an informative reference to RFC 3427 indicating that > any draft that requires option tags for a package > >would need to have the status required for option tag registration. > > One option would have been to define an info feature tag > which can list package value, and each package could then > specify a value. > > E.g sip.info="dtmf-packkage, isup-package" > > But, I am ok with John's proposal also, but I think we should > add some text as suggested by Keith. > > > Option-tag: > ----------- > > I strongly think we should define an option tag for info packages. > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > > Elwell, John > > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:16 AM > > To: Eric Burger; SIP List > > Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags > > > > Eric, > > > > If an individual package requires an option tag, that > option tag could > > > be defined in the RFC that defines the package, which would > need to be > > > standards track. I don't think we need to say anything about this. > > > > Similar situation for media tags, except that RFC would not > need to be > > > standards track. > > > > John > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > > Eric Burger > > > Sent: 20 November 2008 00:48 > > > To: SIP List > > > Subject: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags > > > > > > Do we want to specify media tags to indicate package support? > > > > > > Do we want to specify SIP option tags to require Info > > Package support? > > > > > > Comments welcome. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
