In which case you need an option tag for the info package itself. Noone is precluding that.
regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:47 PM > To: Paul Kyzivat > Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); SIP List; Elwell, John; Christer Holmberg > Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags > > > On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > > > > > > Dean Willis wrote: > > > >> If I don't support info-packages, then I MIGHT support > old-info. If I > >> do, then I MIGHT understand an INFO (or the legacy set), > and I MIGHT > >> send you one (from the legacy set). But I'm very, very unlikely to > >> understand any of the new CID-indirection-to-select-a- body, > >> multiple-body stuff, so don't send it! > > > > Dean, > > > > You don't need an option tag for this. After the invite, I > can't send > > you an info package unless you have provided a Recv-Info for it. > > Okay, I'm willing to believe that. > > What if I have an application that really, really requires > info- packages, so I want the call to fail if you can't handle them? > > Would this arise, or would it always be preferable to > complete the INVITE exchange, then tear the call down once I > find out that you don't? > > -- > Dean > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
