On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:07 -0500, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > If a B2BUA (B) is doing 3pcc: > > > > |------ C > > | > > A ------ B > > | > > |------ D > > > > and it first connects A to C, and later transfers the call to D, will A > > and C and D all have the same Session-Id? > > Yes, under the current model it would. It's not a necessary scenario > to have the same Session-ID, IMO, but it's covered that way. (but > clearly the remote-tag would not match if D sent a Subscribe to A)
The impression I was left with from the draft was that a session-id would be shared *only* by dialogs that "would be one dialog if the B2BUAs were proxies". That is, by dialogs that are logically all one dialog, in terms of the media that are carried. Now you're saying that a group of dialogs that are related in other ways can also share a session-id. I don't see any reference to that usage in the draft's requirements (section 1.1) or use cases (section 1.2). I think you need to clarify this or the discussion will be endlessly confused. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
