> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Jiri Kuthan > Sent: 11 December 2008 17:45 > To: Dean Willis > Cc: Cullen Jennings; SIP List > Subject: Re: [Sip] scope of derive > > Dean Willis wrote: > > > > On Dec 10, 2008, at 7:32 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > > >> > >> I actually don't think that is the case. My recollection, could be > >> very wrong, what that SER edits outbound, not inbound SDP. > That said, > >> if SER editing my inbound SDP, it would check the signature before > >> doing so, and then go and execute my black list that > rejected calls at > >> 2 am form people other than a certain set, then send the > call down to > >> me. Once again, I not getting what is broken in this case. > >> > > > > It's not end to end. If your UAS is checking RFC 4474, it's > going to > > reject the call. > > > > Now, did you WANT a DTLS-SRTP media fingerprint? If so, > then you need > > RFC 4474 end-to-end. > > That I cannot counter. [JRE] I am not sure you need RFC 4474 end-to-end - you just need something end-to-end that binds the fingerprint of the DTLS-SRTP certificate to a substantial part of the SIP message, but that need not include the entire SDP.
John _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
