Few comments.
While this is not a bad idea, its not clear what the point of it is,
given draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01.txt suggests anyway a different
header field for dialog identification through b2bua. Indeed the
introduction in this document still talks about dialog correlation. Is
this meant as a way to fix up existing call-id using extensions in a
backwards compatible way, while session-id is for future things?
I do apologize I did not follow much of the discussion at the end of
last year if this was discussed then.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 111 Wood Avenue South
Cisco Fellow Iselin, NJ 08830
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
[email protected]
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
