why not use a sips uri that contains a telephone number instead (in the sense of section 19.1.6, RFC 3261) ? Eg: sips:+355-554-1234567;postd= p...@foo.com;user=phone
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 21:24, Avshalom Houri <avsha...@il.ibm.com> wrote: > I have found discussion thread on how to secure e.g. TEL URI over SIP from > 2007. > transport=tls is deprecated and it does not mean end to end anyway. > We still do not have "tels" URI. > > Was this discussion concluded and if how it was concluded? > > --Avshalom > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipp...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > -- aayush ====== http://www.linkedin.com/in/abhatnagar19
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipp...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
