On 04/26/2010 06:02 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
I also don't feel *strongly* about it. Lets see if anybody else has
something to say about it.
OK. Thanks.
For other folks still monitoring the sip list, if you think that
draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix should explicitly spell out that
port number comparison should be done on binary equivalency and
not textual equivalency, please let me know.
IESG last call is over on the draft, and I am trying to
wrap it up. So please get back to me at your earliest
convenience. I will revise and resubmit a new version next
week.
Thank you,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on how to develop a SIP
implementation.
Use dispa...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip.
Use sipc...@ietf.org for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP
specifications.
