On 4/26/10 18:02, Apr 26, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
Writing leading zeroes for IPv4 address is not prevalent; by the
same token, representing ports in octal base is not prevalent either.
So I am inclined to let sleeping dogs lie.
However, if the sponsoring AD or anyone monitoring this list feels
strongly, I don't mind adding a sentence or two to this effect in
the draft.
I don't feel strongly about it. But now that you mention it, I think I
remember some question about octal ports coming up on one of the
mailing lists some time in the past.
I also don't feel *strongly* about it. Lets see if anybody else has
something to say about it.
For what it's worth, typing "http://www.ietf.org:080/"; into Firefox,
Safari, and MSIE all takes me to the IETF's web page (interpreting "080"
as 80, not 64). So, at least for HTTP URLs, there's a de facto
interpretation of leading zeros in a port as padding, not an indication
of octal.
/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP
implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP
specifications.
