On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:35 PM, chandan kumar <chandan_...@yahoo.co.in>wrote:
> Hi mayamatkeshi,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> I have checked for Local Cancel, by making change as you mentioned.Stil the
> same issue.
> in ethreal I can see branch parameter getting changed for CANCEL request
>
What do you mean? Do the Via in the INVITE and CANCEL are the same or not?
If yes, I would recommend read about CANCEL in the RFC3261.
>
> For the Remote Cancel ,in ethereal it shows properly Lats_cSEQ is CANCEL
> only.
>
This is confusing.
The "200 OK" for INVITE has a header like "CSeq: XX INVITE" or not?
If not, make it so.
>
> What else could be the issue? any guess.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Ckumar.
> --- On *Mon, 18/4/11, mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Sipp Scripts
> To: "chandan kumar" <chandan_...@yahoo.co.in>
> Cc: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Monday, 18 April, 2011, 12:43 PM
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:47 PM, chandan kumar
> <chandan_...@yahoo.co.in<http://in.mc954.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=chandan_...@yahoo.co.in>
> > wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I have written scripts for Local Cancel (making a call & cancel it from
> Sipp) & Remote-Cancel ( While Sipp is ringing initiator cancels the call)
> .But with these Im not getting desired results.
>
>
> For 487 from Sipp...my Voip phone,SJ Phone is not sending ACK
>
>
> I suspect this is happening because you are using
> [last_CSeq:]
> when sending the "200 OK" for INVITE. But the last_CSeq receveid was for
> CANCEL.
>
> You should take a look at the messages being exchanged.
>
>
>
> For CANCEL from Sipp :my VoipPhone ,SJphone responds with 481 Call/Leg
> Doesn't exit.
>
>
> If i remember the RFC, the Via header in the CANCEL must be the same as in
> the INVITE.
> Try this in the CANCEL:
> Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch-3]
>
>
>
> Can some one point me where is the issue in these scripts.
>
> Please find the aatched Scripts.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Ckumar.
>
> Please find the attached scripts.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing list
> Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net<http://in.mc954.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
