On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:41 PM, mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:35 PM, chandan kumar <chandan_...@yahoo.co.in>wrote:
>
>> Hi mayamatkeshi,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>>
>> I have checked for Local Cancel, by making change as you mentioned.Stil
>> the same issue.
>> in ethreal I can see branch parameter getting changed for CANCEL request
>>
>
> What do you mean? Do the Via in the INVITE and CANCEL are the same or not?
> If yes, I would recommend read about CANCEL in the RFC3261.
>
>
>>
>> For the Remote Cancel ,in ethereal it shows properly Lats_cSEQ is CANCEL
>> only.
>>
>
> This is confusing.
> The "200 OK" for INVITE has a header like "CSeq: XX INVITE" or not?
>
I meant:
The "487 Request Terminated" fro INVITE has a header like "CSeq: XX INVITE"
or not?
If not, make it so.
>
>
>>
>> What else could be the issue? any guess.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Ckumar.
>> --- On *Mon, 18/4/11, mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com>* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Sipp Scripts
>> To: "chandan kumar" <chandan_...@yahoo.co.in>
>> Cc: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Date: Monday, 18 April, 2011, 12:43 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:47 PM, chandan kumar
>> <chandan_...@yahoo.co.in<http://in.mc954.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=chandan_...@yahoo.co.in>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I have written scripts for Local Cancel (making a call & cancel it from
>> Sipp) & Remote-Cancel ( While Sipp is ringing initiator cancels the call)
>> .But with these Im not getting desired results.
>>
>>
>> For 487 from Sipp...my Voip phone,SJ Phone is not sending ACK
>>
>>
>> I suspect this is happening because you are using
>> [last_CSeq:]
>> when sending the "200 OK" for INVITE. But the last_CSeq receveid was for
>> CANCEL.
>>
>> You should take a look at the messages being exchanged.
>>
>>
>>
>> For CANCEL from Sipp :my VoipPhone ,SJphone responds with 481 Call/Leg
>> Doesn't exit.
>>
>>
>> If i remember the RFC, the Via header in the CANCEL must be the same as in
>> the INVITE.
>> Try this in the CANCEL:
>> Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch-3]
>>
>>
>>
>> Can some one point me where is the issue in these scripts.
>>
>> Please find the aatched Scripts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Ckumar.
>>
>> Please find the attached scripts.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
>> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
>> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
>> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about
>> boosting
>> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sipp-users mailing list
>> Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net<http://in.mc954.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
