2011/7/3 William King <quentus...@gmail.com>

> **
> Mayamatakeshi,
>
> Do you have a link to documentation that describes how to run multiple
> scenarios at the same time?
>

Just start multiple instances of sipp.


>
>
> On 07/02/2011 09:06 AM, sammy wrote:
>
> Hello, mayamatakeshi
> Thanks for your reply. I want to simulate a conference caller with SIPP,
> the conference caller must handle NOTIFY and another INVITE in one scenario,
> the whole sequence is as below:
>      INVITE ----------> with call-id [xxxxx]
>      200 <---------- with call-id [xxxxx]
>  ACK ----------> with call-id [xxxxx]
>  REFER <---------- with call-id [xxxxx]
>   NOTIFY ----------> with call-id [xxxxx]
>
>    INVITE   ----------> with call-id [yyyyy]
>
>    200 <---------- with call-id [yyyyy]
>
>    ACK ----------> with call-id [yyyyy]
>
>  So, your sugggestion for: one scenario for NOTIFY and another for INVITE
> and run them at the same time..  I think it do not match the sequence. Is
> there any other method to find the content of 200 OK message and then do
> jump handle? My 200 OK message with call-id [yyyyy] definitely has char like
> "meetme" and 200 OK message with call-id [xxxxx]  has not.
>
>  At 2011-07-02 01:15:55,mayamatakeshi 
> <mayamatake...@gmail.com><mayamatake...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> 2011/7/1 sammy <sa...@126.com>
>
>>  Hi,guys.
>>
>>  I want to do call scenario as below:
>>
>>  NOTIFY ----------> with call-id [xxxxx]
>>
>>     INVITE   ----------> with call-id [yyyyy]
>>
>>       200 <---------- with call-id [yyyyy]
>>
>>          ACK ----------> with call-id [yyyyy]
>>
>>
>>  I just want to ack the invite handle with call-id [yyyyy], but  when
>> scenario receive 200 OK for the NOTIFY handle with call-id [xxxxx] not my
>> expect 200 OK for INVITE with call-id [yyyyy], it will auto send ACK for it,
>> how could i identify the different 200 OK and send the right ACK at right
>> time?
>>
>>
> Hi. This is not possible.
> Why don't you just use one scenario for NOTIFY and another for INVITE and
> run them at the same time against the same server?
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing 
> listSipp-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing list
> Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to