On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:39 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Woof! > > > > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:04:33 -0400, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Why does sipx proxy challenge REFER requests from services that are > >> known to be co-hosted with it? It could be made more efficient if such > >> requests were not challenged. > > > > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Why_sipXecs_challenges_REFER > > > > --Woof! > > > > Thanks! Good pointer. I guess, the specific question is - why does the > Park server get challenged ? It is a "trusted component", but I > suppose the answer is "to make it a special case would be more trouble > than its worth".
No - it's because there is no way (sort of TLS) to be sure that the message is from a "trusted component" - indeed, we have no such concept. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
