On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:39 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Woof! > > > > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:04:33 -0400, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Why does sipx proxy challenge REFER requests from services that are > >> known to be co-hosted with it? It could be made more efficient if such > >> requests were not challenged. > > > > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Why_sipXecs_challenges_REFER > > > > --Woof! > > > > Thanks! Good pointer. I guess, the specific question is - why does the > Park server get challenged ? It is a "trusted component", but I > suppose the answer is "to make it a special case would be more trouble > than its worth".
"To compel the Park Server to attach credentials to its request, which credentials can be used in further processing." The point is not to validate the Park Server but *to obtain credentials from it* which can be attached to other requests. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
