On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:45 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Christopher Parfitt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry I did set the sipxproxy to DEBUG but I had to restart sipxpbx > > mannually as it did not "take" > > > > Here is the DEBUG sipxproxy log > > > > > > C. > > > > I see the same problem as I was having. The PAI header makes > FreeSWITCH send out a challenge response. I dont know whether an > external issue is appropriate for this case or we can remove PAI for > all "in-domain" routing (not bound for a gateway). Opinions solicited > .....
but the entire _purpose_ of PAI is to provide the identity to services within the domain. Has anyone looked at the freeswitch code and/or contacted the developers to find out why it is sending that challenge? Incidentally, getting two proxy challenges, even with the same realm and different nonce values is totally legal, and a really good UA would handle it. Not that that helps us right now... _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
