On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woof! > > In an attempt to calm some of the debate about FreeSWITCH and PAI, here is > the current situation as I see it: > > 1. FreeSWITCH has never authorized our calls before, and we do not want > it to. It is not supposed to in our configuration, as it has no "users" > against which to authorize. > > 2. It is SPECULATION on Ranga's part that the PAI header on the call > caused FreeSWITCH to do this. This may indeed be the case, but it is not > confirmed. It may be something completely different.
It is indeed SPECULATIVE. It simply started to appear after that change but that could be co-incidental. FWIW 013329 works without authorization on my system. Thanks Ranga > > 3. When we figure out why FreeSWITCH is asking for authorization, we > (sipX) will make sure to set up the FreeSWITCH config such that it doesn't > do that. If that is not possible, then we will ask the FreeSWITCH guys > for some help. > > > --Woof! > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
