On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 14:28 -0400, Robert Joly wrote: > I was testing the latest version of the NAT traversal feature with > sipXbridge. The testing revealed a need for the NAT Traversal feature > to recognize calls that will exit sipX's local private network through > an SBC (e.g. a call initiated by a local user to an ITPS via > sipXbridge). Failure to recognize that will result in no-way speech > path when sipXbridge is used as an SBC and sipXecs is deployed behind > a NAT that cannot do hairpinning.
Did you ever get a response to this? Although I don't see why NAT traversal would have a problem with this. An SBC makes the call appear to be a call on the internal network, so NAT traversal mechanisms in sipX shouldn't be triggered. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
