On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 13:05 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 15:28 +0000, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > So... services need exactly one address that the human has chosen so > > that it will work. The best way to get it is, alas, to ask the human. > > Can we depend on the alarm service to get a human to notice if the > address no longer matches what the server is using, or no longer matches > the FQDN? If we can do that, having the user enter the address is much > less problematic.
Can we depend on the user not finding a way to set things up so badly that nothing works including the alarm? No. No matter what we do, someone will find a way to mess it up completely. But in those cases, they'll know the system isn't working. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
