On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:50 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > Scott Lawrence wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:51 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > >> Is there anything that prevents sipXrelay from running if neither NAT > >> Traversal nor sipXbridge is active? > > > > sipXconfig can control that through the sipXsupervisor... whether or not > > it does is a different question. > > > > > > It doesn't now. It should. > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-2931
The other capability that we already have is that the sipXsupervisor will enforce process start order for services on the same system. If Process A declares Process B to be a required resource, then A will not be started until after B is running. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
