Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 07:41 -0400, Martin Steinmann wrote: >> On the Internet Calling screen sipXbridge is offered as one of the >> possible choices for an SBC. Internet Calling allows the routing of >> SIP URI dialed “calls” through an SBC from the inside network to the >> Internet. E.g. if a user dials a call to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then that >> call is routed throiugh one of the specified SBCs in order to receive >> proper NAT handling and be able to pass the firewall. >> >> >> >> Can sipXbridge do that? > > With the new NAT compensation feature, no SBC is needed for it. >
Are you saying that when NAT traversal is enabled I do not have to configure and enable Internet Calling? Or are you saying that Internet Calling (as in: "routing SIP urls calls through specific SBCs") is not needed at all? BTW: I asked Bob about it and I think he said Internet Calling might still be needed (I might have misunderstood something but I think he mentioned other capabilities of SIP aware firewalls that our NAT compensation does not handle). I'd like to know what would be the typical usage patterns here so that we can design UI that matches it. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
