> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence, Scott (BL60:9D30) 
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:57 PM
> To: Beeton, Carolyn (CAR:9D60)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] initial value of sipXconfig version
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:01 -0500, Carolyn Beeton wrote:
> > I believe the patch has been submitted so that sipXconfig 
> "sets" the 
> > expected version, which supervisor will use to hold off starting 
> > various processes until their files have been replicated.  
> (Currently 
> > this check is turned off).
> > 
> > However there is a bootstrap problem, as sipXconfig itself 
> doesn't get 
> > started if its version doesn't match.
> > 
> > I thought Scott mentioned that he was going to set sipXconfig's 
> > version in the sipx-setup script, but I can't find it 
> anywhere.  Am I 
> > missing something?
> 
> The version is set in the etc/init.d/sipxpbx startup script 
> (so that it always matches).
> 
> 
Now I have a clearer understanding of what is being checked: the version
in the *-process.xml files, which reflects the version of the installed
software, against the version in the process-cfgver files, which was
previously written (or at least should have been written - I'll have a
look at that next) by sipXconfig, and reflects the version of the config
files.  The intent is to block if new software has been installed, but
the config files are still from the old version.  sipXconfig's config
version is always forced up to the latest (oops - bad word!) so that it
should never block

EXCEPT:

In designer builds, the process.xml files are not being installed during
build (even after autoreconf and configure), so we will have a problem
as I did yesterday when the config version changes (each month), unless
people delete their output directories - or someone figures out how to
install these files as part of each build.

Carolyn
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to