> Andy Spitzer wrote: > > Woof! > > > > A call from LG (207) to Snom (206) leaves the call > connected on the Snom (206) when the LG (207) hangs up first. > > > > sipXproxy Logs and sipviewer trace attaced. > > > > This did not happen under previous proxy versions. Not > sure of the exact revision, however. > > > > --Woof! > > > > > > This looks like a snom problem. The phone registers at > 47.16.90.145:2051, so the initial INVITE is sent to this > address. However, the contact address send back in the 180 > Ringing and 200OK response is > > Contact: > <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;transport=tcp;line=fw079ysn>;flow-id=1 > > Hence, both the ACK, and the BYE are constructed using the > request URI > > BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;transport=tcp;line=fw079ysn SIP/2.0 > > Which means, the request gets forwarded by sipXproxy to > 47.16.90.145:5060. But, I am guessing snom is not listening > on that port, so the BYE gets no response and eventually times out. > > I am surprised you have speech path between the two phones.
Interesting observation. Is there any way for you to point your phone to an older system to compare the traces? If you do not have one, let me know, I probably can find one on my side. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
