> > Woof! > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:33:01 -0500, Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Interesting observation. Is there any way for you to point > your phone > > to an older system to compare the traces? > > Here is the same call flow, on the same phones, running against 3.10 >
The biggest difference between the two call flows is that the 3.10 trace uses UDP whereas the 3.11.8 trace uses TCP. The NAT traversal feature introduces new headers and URL parameters which increases the size of the message. One possibility is that the recent merge of the NAT traversal code pushed the size of the message beyond 1300 which caused TCP to get used and perhaps there is a TCP incompatibility between Snom and sipXecs. The other possibility is that the new headers and URL params confuse the Snom phone. I may have a Snom phone here. I'll try to configure it for TCP only and point it at a 3.10 system to see what happens. I'll post back to let you know the results. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
