Robert Joly wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Krzeminski, Damian (BL60:9D30) >> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 2:28 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Is XECS-415 really fixed? >> >> Robert Joly wrote: >>>> Thanks - I'll check in as soon as I see your check-in. And >> maybe we >>>> can finally test it :-) D. >>> Committed in R14088. >> >> http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/ViewVC/sipXecs?view=rev&rev=14091 >> http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/ViewVC/sipXecs?view=rev&rev=14092 >> >> userlocation is now replicated >> fallbackrules.xml adheres to a new format with separate >> trasform lists for each location >> >> Add couple of user groups, assign gateways to locations and >> check if this is what you had in mind. >> D. > > Damian, I finally found some time to look up the work you had done. > Although I haven't tested the functionality yet, I have a couple of > comments on the GUI itself: > > 1- Users do not have a 'Location' setting. > 2- The choices that appear in the 'Location' pull-down list of gateways > are the configured groups, not locations. I thought we had agreed that > although they are implemented similarly, groups and locations would be > distinct concepts at the user level.
That's intentional (I tried to be very explicit about it in my commit comments). My goal was to make sure that we get fallbackrules generations correct. I kept the issue open though. We'll might reintroduce the location concept, but for now the UI does provide enough for all the user stories, right? > 3- The 'Location' pull-down list of gateways does not allow multiple > selections. We need to be able to specify that a gateway serves several > locations. Again intentional: in this case I am not really even sure that the concept of multiple 'locations' of a single gateway is really needed - and it does complicate configuring and understanding of the concept. Any good reasons why admin might need > 4- Dialplan rules are missing a checkbox to indicate whether the rule is > subject to location-based routing or not. Yes. That's coming. > 5- For usability, the Gateway list appearing in the dialplan rule page > should have two extra columns; one enumerating the location(s) of the > gateway and one to indicate whether or not the gateway is shared. > We are slowly running out of real estate here. But probably it does make sense to add at least location. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
