Dale Worley wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 09:58 -0500, Arjun Nair wrote: >> I tested constructing the request using just the GRUU, against the >> LG-Nortels. The request is correctly routed to the registrar, where >> the request-URI is replaced by the phone's contact address. However, >> the GRUU address is still present in the To header, and the phone >> chokes on that. > > In light of http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XECS-1960#action_33121, > you may want to revise your strategy. > > (BTW, how did you generate the To header? The pub-gruu element value > should always contain a real URI, which if you'd copied, it would have > been valid.) >
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As you pointed out before, I was passing the gruu URI to the RLS server without prefixing it with "sip:".. In this particular case, when I build the reg-info xml message, I replaced the contact URI with the GRUU, and the gruu is stored in the system without a "sip:" prefix. Hence, this happened when the RLS built the message using the incomplete URI. This should be a straight forward fix. > (Unfortunately, my Wireshark crashes when I try to examine > LG-Nortel_trace.pcap from XECS-1960.) > Crashes for me as well, despite the fact that the traces were captured from the same linux wireshark.. Works fine on the windows wireshark though.. Arjun _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
