M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Damian Krzeminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> M. Ranganathan wrote:
[...] >> log4j.properties should probably not be monopolized by sipXconfig (it comes >> from times when sipXconfig was the only java application in sipx). >> >> I'll gladly move out of the way with it. I do not even remember from top of >> my head how sipXconfig is finding it at the moment... >> D. > > > I would not recommend removing it. I just have to be careful not to > use PropertyConfigurator. It is a good place to centralize logging > overrides. > OK - I am not touching it then. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
