Damian wrote: > Scott Lawrence wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 17:02 -0500, Huijun Yang wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> For Polycom phones, as Paul Mossman commented in XCF-1614, > polycom do > >> support per-Line Outbound Proxy configuration: > >> reg.X.outboundProxy.address. In order to solve the > problem described > >> in XCF-1614 : "Calls dialed by URL (e.g. using speed dial) > bypass the > >> proxy and therefore do not report as CDRs", for polycom > phones, I am > >> proposing to set outbond proxy to sipX by default for each > line. Does > >> anyone forsee problem with this? > > > > This should work fine. > > > > Even registrations to other domains could go through our proxy (it > > might even help if they need to be routed to an SBC to get out). > > > > > > There is another (potential) problem with that: some phones - > and I do not remember if it was Polycom - do not use DNS SRV > lookup if you specifically set 'outbound proxy' field. > > In such cases we have to use fully qualified name of the > primary server in the cluster (which of course defeats HA). > > Latests patch: > > http://track.sipfoundry.org/secure/attachment/17033/XCF-1614.patch > > sets Polycom outbound proxy to SIP domain name. Which is OK > if Polycom can resolve it correctly.
Good point, thanks for the heads up. I'll add a note to the JIRA issue requesting that this be tested in HA. > BTW: Huijun, Paul: Now that Polycom plug-in is out of the > core it's fully yours. If you have changes limited to > plugins/polycom directory you need to check them in yourselves. Got it. Please feel free to ping Huijun/me anyone if your Polycom plugin patches sit around unreviewed for more than a couple of days. -Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
