Scott wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:54 -0500, Paul Mossman wrote: .... > > It has been suggested to me that the second challenge could > be viewed > > as a failure of the first challenge. That is not my understanding, > > but I'd like to put the possibility out there. > > > > Are we confident that our behaviour is correct, and the > behaviour of > > both Polycom and CounterPath is wrong? > > I am confident. > > Check the list of authors for RFC 2617.
Point taken. :) -Paul _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
