On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:54 -0500, Paul Mossman wrote: > Back to the original problem reported against CounterPath and Polycom, > XTRN-361: Phones fail to SUBSCRIBE. > > We believe that the UAs should not fail to respond to the UA challenge > received after a Proxy.
(resolving the double negative) UAs should treat a 407 followed by a 401 as two different events and retry again with both a Proxy-Authorization header using the challenge from the Proxy-Authenticate header in the 407 response and an Authorization header using the challenge from the WWW-Authenticate header in the 401 response. > It has been suggested to me that the second challenge could be viewed as > a failure of the first challenge. That is not my understanding, but I'd > like to put the possibility out there. > > Are we condfident that our behaviour is correct, and the behaviour of > both Polycom and CounterPath is wrong? I am confident. Check the list of authors for RFC 2617. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
