If I don't hear any objection, I am assuming everyone is ok that I will proceed to change process name of sipxPresenceService to "ACDPresenceServer". cheers Huijun
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yang, Huijun (CAR:9D30) Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:46 AM To: sipx dev Subject: [sipX-dev] PresenceServer Name confusion XCF-3268 Hello, http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-3268 <http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-3268> "From System > Servers > Services the Presence Server is shown as 'Running' >From a putty session command sipxproc -l is run and the PrescenceServer is shown as 'disabled' " It was found out that the status of the relevant services is correct in fact. The problem lies in the name mismatch. On Server --> Services screen, The underneath mapping is as following: "Presence" ---> sipxRlsService "ACD Agent Status" ---> sipxPresenceService (acd presence) While the mapping for internal process name from sipxproc is: "PresenceServer" ---> sipxPresenceService (acd presence) "ResourceListServer" ---> sipxRlsService Now you can easily tell where the problem is, "PresenceServer" means different thing in different context. I know we had a discussion on the name of services before. (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/14261/focus=14314 <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/14261/focus=14314> ) Since the names of the services shown on Server --> Services screen had been compiled in the dev list, I am not propose the services name changes, but I think we should rename the internal processname of "PresenceServer" to "ACDPresenceServer" to be consistent and avoid confusion. Objections? Thanks, Huijun
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
