> Robert, is that work going to happen before the 4.0 release?

I'm not the one making the call but I'm told that it is.  Stay tuned. 




> Thanks,
>   Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Joly
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:04 AM
> To: Matt White; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Remote Worker setup
> 
> > 
> > I got the phone to work well but the registration still shows  
> > "x-sipX-nonat", however, I suspect that is becuase on the 
> phone config 
> > I have the "NAT" option turned on and filled in the phones 
> external ip 
> > address.  I will change it back and confirm that the registration 
> > updated properly.  The phone is a Cisco 7960.
> 
> That is surely the cause.
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > The problem was that in "NAT Traversal" under External 
> Address I had 
> > the internal ip address.
> > 
> > 
> > Once I changed this to the External NATTED ip, it worked.  
> > The wording for this setting is confusing because it says
> > 
> > "The ITSP facing address. This is the NATed public address. 
> > If you have only one interface on your machine it will be the 
> > same as your local address."   
> 
> I agree that this is 100% mileading.  We have work planned to 
> dramatically simplify and clean-up the configuration for NAT 
> traversal.
> 
> 
> 8<
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to