Andy Spitzer wrote: > Woof! > > > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:15 +0200, Mircea Carasel wrote: >> Ideally would be to somehow >> differentiate different >> "types" of tables: tables that should grow with the window and tables >> that look better when they have fixed width. > > Is there a way to add a "miniumum" and "maximum" size to the tables, so they > grow or shrink but only up to a point? > >>> I have tested the patch and it looks great (except for a few tables >>> (Servers table) that in my opinion look better with fixed size) > > The patch needs to be looked at on all the various browsers we care about...I > seem to recall the last time we did something like this it didn't work in all > cases on all browsers. > > --Woof!
As far as I remember 2 major reasons for fixed width are: - our old friend IE that has its own idea about what width really means and until very recently it was getting very upsetting about the lack of fixed width - current User Portal that has way too many options in the menu level I have seen that Carolyn committed her changes. Did someone have a chance to check those 2 since then? D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
