> Dale Worley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:56 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:16 -0400, Huijun Yang wrote:
> >>
> >>> What would be an appropriate name for the new rule type?  "Inter-
> site
> >>> rule"?
> >> Site-to-Site
> >> ?
> >
> > "Federated system"?  I don't know if anyone outside Nortel knows
that
> > term, but it's popular in NT circles, and has the advantage that the
> > phrase has no other meanings.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> >
> 
> I actually quite like "Site to Site". Federated system is less graphic

+1 on Site to Site

> and
> more scary. We could use UI similar to the one used for Long Distance
> rule
> (drop prefix, add prefix etc. - custom rule UI might be a bit too
> much).
> 
> On a slightly related note (http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-
> 3634). I
> spent some time thinking about generous offer sipXconfig team got from
> Robert ;-) "A meeting was held [...]. The sipXconfig team is free to
> implement whichever solution they deem the safest and simplest."
> 
> None of the proposals actually look very safe and obvious to the end
> user.
> But since we're already adding a new type of dialing rule the least
> invasive change would be to modify authrules generation just for this
> type
> of rule.
> 
> In other word if you use site-to-site rule type sipXconfig will
> generate an
> entry in authrules matching any user part and allowing for transfers
> with
> no permission required. Generation of of authrules for other rules'
> types
> would not be affected.
> 
> That strikes me as the safest option. Will that fix site-to-site
> transfer
> problem?
> 
> Damian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to