On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:30 +0200, Lukasz Kutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I did some testing of sipregistrar and it looks like there is memory > leak of this process in HA configuration. > > My envirement: > - sipxecs 4.0.0-015321 > - centos 5.3 > > I did 2 tests: > > 1. One server - no redundancy. > - added 700 useres to sipx > - I send 700 registrations to sipx with expiration time 360s > > Result: After 3 days sipregistrar consumed 0.5% of memory. I wasn't able > to notice any memory leak, everything looks ok. > > 2. Added distributed system with redundant sip router role. > - First server (sip1) > - Distributed server (sip2) > - | send 700 registrations to sip1 with expiration time 360s (same as > during test1) > - sip1 replicate registrations to sip2 > - sip2 only role was to receive registrations from sip1 > > Results: > - sip1 sipregistrar memory usage increase from 0.2% to 6.3% during 5h > - sip2 sipregistrar memory usage increase from 0.5% to 7.3% during 5h > > sip1 > Mon May 4 10:59:33 CEST 2009 - 503 17038 1.1 0.2 52476 10604 > pts/1 Sl 10:58 0:00 /usr/bin/sipregistrar > Mon May 4 15:11:53 CEST 2009 - 503 17038 3.1 6.3 273812 230056 > ? Sl 10:58 7:54 /usr/bin/sipregistrar > > sip2 > Mon May 4 10:59:41 CEST 2009 - 503 29259 3.4 0.5 63556 20920 > ? Sl 10:55 0:07 /usr/bin/sipregistrar > Mon May 4 15:12:50 CEST 2009 - 503 29259 1.0 7.3 311228 268056 > ? Sl 10:55 2:37 /usr/bin/sipregistrar
It's not too surprising that the memory usage would be higher - does it continue to rise, or does it level off? I can't recall any major changes in that area from 3.10.3, but... _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
