On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:44 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the help and your time. > > I found out my problem. I made some more tests and the problem was that > i have changed xml_rpc port from 9090 to something different. I made > additional tests with changing the port and calling to PSTN number. When > is set port 9090, i don't get the debug messages for SSL exceptions. > When i change it to something else, then i get "Internal Server Error in > the client" and the SSL excetions in sipxbridge.log. > > Is it not possible to change xml_rpc port to different on 9090?
I believe the xml rpc port is a hidden parameter. You should not change that. The working assumption is that sipx owns any port that is hidden. Directly editing the xml rpc file is not going to help because sipxconfig will overwrite that file. > > When i use port 9090 and try to call, i get this error message in > sipxbridge: "sipxbridge:"Error in processing request Bridge with the > given ID was not found". I suppose that this is a problem with my Caller > ID configurations for the ITSP, but i'm not sure. This is internal logging from sipxrelay. It is tearing down the relay but the relay is already gone hence he message. This is not really an error. This has no effect on your system and I plan to change the log level of this to DEBUG as it seems to confuse people. > > I continue with my tests. > > Thanks again! Thank you for working with us. Ranga > > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 15:09 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:49 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > i have also a question for the one part of the error message, that i >> > sent before for SSL. >> > >> > i call to number 00359883495466, but why when it is routed to itsp the >> > number is cutted. look here: >> > "2009-05-18T13:13:29.140000Z":9:INCOMING:INFO:asgard.iguanait.com:PipelineThread-0:00000000:sipxbridge:"Read >> > SIP Message :\n----Remote Host:212.xxx.xxx.xxx---- Port:5060----\nINVITE >> > sip:[email protected] >> > >> > >> > why it is [email protected]? is it should be [email protected] >> > or something like this? >> > >> > my dial plan is this way: >> > >> > intenational dial plan -> Permissios International diaing, PSTN prefix >> > 00359, empty long distance prefix, external number lenght - any number >> > of digest. >> > >> > >> >> I don't think the dial plan is at fault here. There's something about >> the ssl handshake which is not right which we need to figure out. >> >> Sorry if my previous response was not too clear. I request you to use >> the command line as suggested by Melcon tcpdump -s0 -i any -w >> filename.pcap So I can look at the trace in wireshark. >> >> >> Regards >> >> Ranga >> > > > > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
