On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Damian Krzeminski<[email protected]> wrote: > ...or "Make sipXbridge available in the Internet calling Default SBC pull > down" > > As the things are implemented now sipXconfig makes sure that all calls > directed to configured ITSP are routed through sipXbridge (by generating > routes to all configured 'trunks' and adding them to forwarding.xml). > > Looks like XX-5884 can be solved if sipXconfig were to allow configuring > sipXbridge as default SBC. This is trivial to do (and you can try it just > by adding 'sipXbridgeSbcModel.internetCallingSupported=true' to > sipxconfig.properties). > > It would be nice to see an explanation on how this change is to affect > XX-5884. But I have a simpler question: if we do change this as requested - > are we to remove automatic routes generation implemented in XX-5623?
After conferring with Scott this morning, I conclude that the two are not mutually exclusive. > > Also what type of advise should we be giving to administrator: should > sipXbridge be always used as default SBC for entire network? Even if there > are no trunks configured? Not sure how or why this relates to selecting sipxbridge in the case under discussion. If the user selects sipxbridge as the default gateway in the pulldown menu then internet calls ( regardless of domain ) will be sent there. > D. > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
