On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:14 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:33 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > I'd say that the way to choose would be to use the one that makes life > > easiest for the CDRs to show the transfer. It seems to me that > > eliminates the first (chain) choice; since the other two would normally > > have the same actual call-id value, I don't see how the labeling makes > > much difference. > > I haven't thought that References might interact with CDR.
At present, the CDR system treats transferred calls as separate. If I get an outside call and blind transfer it to you, then it shows as two different calls in the CDR system (if I consultative transfer to you, it's three calls). Periodically, the issue of fixing this comes up - good References would certainly help. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
