Mark Gertsvolf wrote:

> I don't have the background for the failover discussion, but 
> I wonder if rather then playing with protocol timers and 
> changing them universally at the SIP stack level, perhaps 
> there is a better solution for the failover problem 
> implemented at the application level. Alternatively, at the 
> SIP stack level, perhaps these timers can be set for each 
> transaction based on the type of destination. If destination 
> is IP address, or DNS lookup produces a single destination 
> then failover is not needed and the timers are set to 
> defaults, otherwise use short timers.

Disregard the above comment, I misunderstood Dale's response.

Mark.

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to